{"id":748,"date":"2014-05-01T09:53:48","date_gmt":"2014-05-01T09:53:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.english-culture.com\/?p=748"},"modified":"2018-04-26T16:36:55","modified_gmt":"2018-04-26T16:36:55","slug":"tristran-tzara-philosophy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.english-culture.com\/tristran-tzara-philosophy\/","title":{"rendered":"Tristran Tzara Philosophy"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Tristran<\/a>
Tristran Tzara Philosophy, Literature and Poetry<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

\"\"<\/a>Philosophy is the question: from which side shall we look at life, God, the idea or other phenomena. Everything one looks at is false. I do not consider the relative result more important than the choice between cake and cherries after dinner. The system of quickly looking at the other side of a thing in order to impose your opinion indirectly is called dialectics, in other words, haggling over the spirit of fried potatoes while dancing method around it.<\/span>
\n Tristan Tzara<\/span><\/p>\n

The dialectic is an amusing mechanism which guides us, in a banal kind of way, to the opinions we had in the first place. Does anyone think that, by a minute refinement of logic, he had demonstrated the truth and established the correctness of these opinions? Lo gic imprisoned by the senses is an organic disease. To this element philosophers always like to add: the power of observation. But actually this magnificent quality of the mind is the proof of its impotence. We observe, we regard from one or more points of view, we choose them among the millions that exist. Experience is also a product of chance and individual faculties. Science disgusts me as soon as it becomes a speculative system, loses its character of utility that is so useless but is at least individual. I detest greasy objectivity, and harmony, the science that finds everything in order. Carry on, my children, humanity . . . Science says we are the servants of nature: everything is in order, make love and bash your brains in. Carry on, my children, humanity, kind bourgeois and journalist virgins . . . I am against systems, the most acceptable system is on principle to have none. To complete oneself, to perfect oneself in one’s own littleness, to fill the vessel with one’s individuality, to have the courage to fight for and against thought, the mystery of bread, the sudden burst of an infernal propeller into economic lilies.<\/span>
\n Tristan Tzara<\/span><\/p>\n

There is a literature that does not reach the voracious mass. It is the work of creators, issued from a real necessity in the author, produced for himself. It expresses the knowledge of a supreme egoism, in which laws wither away. Every page must explode, either by profound heavy seriousness, the whirlwind, poetic frenzy, the new, the eternal, the crushing joke, enthusiasm for principles, or by the way in which it is printed. On the one hand a tottering world in flight, betrothed to the glockenspiel of hell, on the other hand: new men. Rough, bouncing, riding on hiccups. Behind them a crippled world and literary quacks with a mania for improvement.<\/span>
\n Tristan Tzara<\/span><\/p>\n

And on the other side for lack of sun there is death perhaps waiting for you in the uproar of a dazzling whirlwind with a thousand explosive arms stretched toward you man flower passing from the seller’s hands to those of the lover and the loved passing from the hand of one event to the other passive and sad parakeet the teeth of doors are chattering and everything is done with impatience to make you leave quickly man amiable merchandise eyes open but tightly sealed cough of waterfall rhythm projected in meridians and slices globe spotted with mud with leprosy and blood winter mounted on its pedestal of night poor night weak and sterile draws the drapery of cloud over the cold menagerie and holds in its hands as if to throw a ball luminous number your head full of poetry.<\/span>
\n Tristan Tzara<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Philosophy is the question: from which side shall we look at life, God, the idea or other phenomena. Everything one looks at is false. I do not consider the relative result more …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":149726,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[161,33,21,146,11,107,16,193,25,127,28],"tags":[1075,1076,1131,166,1132,1133,1134,17,294,1135,128,1137,1080],"class_list":["post-748","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-aphorisms","category-education","category-knowledge","category-life","category-literature","category-logics","category-philosophy","category-poetry","category-quotes-by-arguments","category-science","category-strategy","tag-dada","tag-dadaism","tag-dialectic","tag-literature-2","tag-mechanism","tag-opinions","tag-philosophers","tag-philosophy-2","tag-poetry","tag-power-of-observation","tag-science","tag-systems","tag-tristran-tzara"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t