{"id":93069,"date":"2017-11-03T17:05:16","date_gmt":"2017-11-03T17:05:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.english-culture.com\/?p=93069"},"modified":"2025-10-14T20:35:28","modified_gmt":"2025-10-14T20:35:28","slug":"andros-art-theory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.english-culture.com\/andros-art-theory\/","title":{"rendered":"Andros Art Theory"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Andros<\/a>
Andros theory of art and artists<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Andros art theory, his conception of art and artists. The \u201cA Theory\u201d, that is Androsophy. Read this article and find out more about this genial artist.<\/span><\/p>\n

In life I do various things, in death I will do less.<\/span> Sculptures, paintings, installations, books and other useless stuff: my poor contribution to entropy.<\/span>
\nAndros<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The \u201cA Theory\u201d. <\/span>In this mapping of human chromosomes, observed through the microscope of art, in this \u201chumane genome project\u201d, which analyzes the DNA of the existence, and that I called androsophy, I use all possible methods of investigation, without any limits of form and means.<\/span><\/p>\n

I do not lock myself in the ghetto of the style or of the theme. Because often they become excuses to repeat the same work indefinitely, perhaps to please the market need to deal with artists who are always easily recognizable and identifiable by the unique characteristics that made them more or less known.<\/span><\/p>\n

I do this not only dedicating myself to various forms of art, but interlacing them, incorporating them, I make them rise from each other, I let them influence each other. Each of them is a part of the whole. <\/span>From this considerations, came the idea of a \u201cA Theory\u201d, which mocks the well-known \u201cM-theory\u201d, which in theoretical physics is the theory of everything, that should gives an explanation of the laws of nature bringing them together.<\/span><\/p>\n

Much more modestly, the \u201cA Theory\u201d is instead the theory of my everything, which includes the seven androsophy guidelines, and all the works which they contain \u2013 as well as many works that I have now decided not to include in the site -, everything I\u2019ve ever done with any discipline, material and technique. Intertwined to compose a single huge puzzle.<\/span><\/p>\n

Getting the right emotional distance, neither too close nor too far and neither too in favour nor too adverse, one can be able to see the whole and what it represents.<\/span><\/p>\n

In this sense, the \u201cA Theory\u201d refers to the practice of hybridity and to the supergravity that holds together these hybrids, hence any work I have ever done: including the theoretical structure of this site, the texts \u2013 including the one you are reading now \u2013 and even the very idea of androsophy.<\/span><\/p>\n

The divisions are never sharp, because often an issue is interlinked with others, but above all, are not determined by the medium or technique.<\/span>
\nThe cases in which my works are intertwined and artistic practices copulate to generate new works are many, I will list a few:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2013 The sculpture \u201cArt Funeral\u201d was also an installation, then an entire exhibition and now a guideline.<\/span>
\n\u2013 The sculpture \u201cEgo Bricks\u201d was followed by a second sculpture, then it was an exhibition, and finally became a guideline.<\/span>
\n\u2013 The last line of the poem \u201cTivv\u00f9\u201d has become a sculpture, then an exhibition and, finally, one of the guidelines.<\/span>
\n\u2013 The sculpture \u201cCreed Card\u201d was the protagonist of a passage of \u201cCodice a bare\u201c, a novel that also contains references to other works of mine.<\/span>
\n\u2013 Some sculptures like \u201cWar is a slippery thing, hundreds fall into it\u201c, \u201cLife is a party, a farewell party\u201c, \u201cOur Existence is just an advertisement for Life\u201c,\u201dI use to believe in God, then I was born\u201d and others, are born from some of my aphorisms, which have become their titles.<\/span>
\n\u2013 The sculpture \u201cThe blue faint\u201d has become the main character of one of the tales in the book \u201cSabba di Paralleli\u201c, but before being a sculpture it was part of a comic I made in the eighties.<\/span>
\n\u2013 The sculpture \u201cIntegralienation\u201d has a real painting on the surface.<\/span><\/p>\n

I could go on and on, but I think the concept is clear.<\/span>
\nThere is a continuous interaction between the various things I do, they live together, they have the same goals, they just try to reach them in different ways.<\/span><\/p>\n

Although in hindsight, the ways are diverse but similar: diversimilar, as the title of one of my sculptures. Just like us humans.<\/span>
\nIn fact, I have come to the point where it is increasingly difficult to draw a clear line between the various disciplines: when I am drawing or painting am I placing signs together just like when I write? When I make a sculpture am I drawing in three dimensions? When I write am I shaping phrases as if they were clay?<\/span><\/p>\n

So, to write a painting seems normal to me, as I do with the oil words of the paintings in the Sur-Faces series, and it is also normal to paint a sculpture, like I did with \u201cIntegralienation\u201d: sometimes boundaries are only in the mind.<\/span><\/p>\n

Andros<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

\"YouTube